answers1: "...Socrates argued that people cannot understand the world
until they use rational thought to understand the true nature of
themselves [12]. Socrates was a mind-body dualist, this means that he
thought that the mind is composed of a different substance to the
brain, one that does not obey the same physical laws. The argument
that the mind is made of a substance which does obey the laws of
physics is known as Physicalism or materialism. <br>
<br>
Socrates believed that the mind has an irrational part which is
controlled by emotions and this is drawn to the body. Once the mind
and body merge, the mind is limited by what we are able to perceive
with our senses. The rational part of our mind mostly remains beyond
our conscious knowledge, however Socrates believed that it is the job
of philosophers to connect to the rational mind in order to become a
whole person. Once this is achieved, a rational person will see things
for what they really are. <br>
<br>
Socrates' pupil, Plato, elaborated upon this theory in The Republic,
where he described how the things we perceive on Earth are really
composed of ideas, or Forms [13]. A Form is an eternal and perfect
concept, something which is strived for but never actualised. All
horses, for example, are united by the concept of 'horse', an ideal
which all horses on Earth were built to resemble. But it is not just
physical objects that have Forms. Forms also apply to abstract
concepts such as beauty. Plato argued that all of the Forms exist
outside of the realm of regular perception, in the 'realm of the
Forms'. <br>
<br>
Plato did not trust sensory information because we can confuse reality
with the imagination, the most extreme cases happen when we dream or
hallucinate but this also occurs when we confuse one object for
another. Plato argued that we are often presented with illusions of
this kind, a stick, for example, can appear bent in water, yet when we
pick it up we will find that it is straight. Things are not always
what they seem and we are not always aware that we are making these
mistakes. Plato praised mathematics as one of the only forms of true
knowledge and disliked art because he thought that we distort our
perception even further when we attempt to copy an imperfect image.
<br>
<br>
Plato's simile of the cave describes how we are analogous to people
who spend their lives looking only at shadows. These people will come
to believe that only shadows exist and when someone tells them of the
world of light above they do not believe them. Plato argued that it
takes a philosopher to leave the cave and see the world as it truly
is. Like Socrates, Plato believed this could only be achieved through
rational introspection. <br>
<br>
Socrates and Plato's belief in the soul came from the need to explain
human intellect, animals do not possess anything similar and it could
not be explained mechanically. The Forms explain how the mind
interprets the continuous stream of sensory data it is exposed to by
recognising certain, eternal concepts. If our intellect is composed of
Forms, then it is eternal and distinct from the body. Plato did not
believe that the mind exists in time or space and thought that it
would return to the Realm of the Forms upon death. <br>
<br>
Plato set up an academy for men to learn philosophy and one of its
pupils was Aristotle, who was born in 384 BC. Aristotle rejected many
of Plato's theories including rationalism, he argued that the mind
does not have innate ideas and compared it to an unscribed tablet, a
'tabula rasa' [15]. Aristotle rejected Plato's realm of the Forms,
arguing that the Forms are concepts devised by men to categorise
things. Aristotle argued that the soul was a part of the human body
and so also rejected dualism. He did however, believe that intellect
was different from any other part of the body as our conscious range
is not restricted in the way that our physical senses are. Aristotle
argued that intellect does not have a corresponding bodily organ. This
means that it does not exist in space, despite having a physical
origin..." <br>
<br>
http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/FirstScience.html
answers2: let me check in books.
answers3: He thinks philosophy is a lot of things; (training for
death; pursuing wisdom; grasping the world of the forms/ideas; a
"passed torch"); but only talks about the "true philosophy", mostly
employing Socrates as an exemplary philosopher to describe the "true
philosophy", rather than to actually define philosophy as you request
above. Why wouldn't Plato actually define this "true philosophy"? He
tells you why, quote <br>
<br>
PLATO: <br>
Thus much at least, I can say about all writers, past or future, who
say they know the things to which I devote myself, whether by hearing
the teaching of me or of others, or by their own discoveries-that
according to my view it is not possible for them to have any real
skill in the matter. There neither is nor ever will be a treatise of
mine on the subject. For it does not admit of exposition like other
branches of knowledge; but after much converse about the matter itself
and a life lived together, suddenly a light, as it were, is kindled in
one soul by a flame that leaps to it from another, and thereafter
sustains itself. Yet this much I know-that if the things were written
or put into words, it would be done best by me, and that, if they were
written badly, I should be the person most pained. Again, if they had
appeared to me to admit adequately of writing and exposition, what
task in life could I have performed nobler than this, to write what is
of great service to mankind and to bring the nature of things into the
light for all to see? But I do not think it a good thing for men that
there should be a disquisition, as it is called, on this topic-except
for some few, who are able with a little teaching to find it out for
themselves. As for the rest, it would fill some of them quite
illogically with a mistaken feeling of contempt, and others with lofty
and vain-glorious expectations, as though they had learnt something
high and mighty. <br>
<br>
On this point I intend to speak a little more at length; for perhaps,
when I have done so, things will be clearer with regard to my present
subject. There is an argument which holds good against the man
ventures to put anything whatever into writing on questions of this
nature; it has often before been stated by me, and it seems suitable
to the present occasion. <br>
<br>
For everything that exists there are three instruments by which the
knowledge of it is necessarily imparted; fourth, there is the
knowledge itself, and, as fifth, we must count the thing itself which
is known and truly exists. The first is the name, the, second the
definition, the third. the image, and the fourth the knowledge. If you
wish to learn what I mean, take these in the case of one instance, and
so understand them in the case of all. A circle is a thing spoken of,
and its name is that very word which we have just uttered. The second
thing belonging to it is its definition, made up names and verbal
forms. For that which has the name "round," "annular," or, "circle,"
might be defined as that which has the distance from its circumference
to its centre everywhere equal. Third, comes that which is drawn and
rubbed out again, or turned on a lathe and broken up-none of which
things can happen to the circle itself-to which the other things,
mentioned have reference; for it is something of a different order
from them. Fourth, comes knowledge, intelligence and right opinion
about these things. Under this one head we must group everything which
has its existence, not in words nor in bodily shapes, but in
souls-from which it is dear that it is something different from the
nature of the circle itself and from the three things mentioned
before. Of these things intelligence comes closest in kinship and
likeness to the fifth, and the others are farther distant. <br>
<br>
The same applies ... (snip)... For this reason no man of intelligence
will venture to express his philosophical views in language,
especially not in language that is unchangeable, which is true of that
which is set down in written characters. [Plato 7th Letter; 341b -
343a] <br>
<br>
In other words if Plato defined "the philosopher" or "philosophy" that
would be a 2nd level or very low level of understanding of the word at
about 3 removes from the "true philosophy itself", which he refuses to
put into writing, for the above stated reasons. That is why he
founded an "Academy" so that he could personally "pass the torch" of
"true philosophy" on to other personal initiates. <br>
<br>
Kevin
answers4: The method wherein the tale of Atlantis is written makes it
transparent that it was once now not intended to be truly. The concept
that the Greeks traced any form of civilisation again to nine,six
hundred BC (roughly) is under no circumstances intended to be a truly
date; even the legendary groundwork studies of towns do not date again
so much past a thousand BC. As such, it's completely external the
authentic global because the Greeks knew it, facet of the legendary
global of tale. It is used as a philosophical allegory; attributing
the tale to Solon is a typical trope of Athenians seeking to deliver
the which means in their stories bigger respectability. Critias might
good be an incomplete textual content, which means it's some distance
from transparent what its over-arching which means was once intended
to be, however this doesn't imply that the instantaneous context isn't
especially transparent. People - good, people who take greater than a
superficial curiosity, a minimum of - don't suppose that Socrates'
conversations as recorded always occurred. It is the message inside
them that's huge, now not the element of the tale itself.
Monday, 30 September 2019
Sunday, 29 September 2019
What Are the Best Performing Art Colleges in California?
answers1: Berkley...I think <br>
Here in SA we have the South African National School of the arts
Here in SA we have the South African National School of the arts
Saturday, 28 September 2019
Dance as a performing art?
answers1: well dancing can be seen as a form of expression much like a
painting. you can have van goghs blue phase paintings or a dance done
to a mellow song with blue lighting or costuming. <br>
<br>
both spark feeling in the artist and the viewer.
answers2: dance is a way of expressing yourself just like music,
drama, media, visual arts <br>
<br>
it can show how your feeling and happiness and rage
answers3: Dancing bodies can express emotion in ways that words cannot
answers4: I see others have provided the Scripture. i think there will
be a rapture yet while and the place and how many i do no longer
understand. i won't be able to come to a decision if that is going to
likely be each and all the Christians, or all those with a organic
coronary heart or people who're relatively close to to God. I
additionally do no longer understand, while it comprises end time
stuff, no rely if the rapture is meant again till now or in the
process the Tribulation. some people have faith there will be better
than a million rapture, so as that in case you omit one you have got
time to get your existence stunning with God and pass up contained in
the subsequent one. i do no longer in my view think of it concerns. as
long as your coronary heart is suitable and you reside for God then
you extremely will heaven no rely while you're raptured or no longer.
So yeah, i think contained in the rapture yet i does no longer be
upset if i grew to become into incorrect.
painting. you can have van goghs blue phase paintings or a dance done
to a mellow song with blue lighting or costuming. <br>
<br>
both spark feeling in the artist and the viewer.
answers2: dance is a way of expressing yourself just like music,
drama, media, visual arts <br>
<br>
it can show how your feeling and happiness and rage
answers3: Dancing bodies can express emotion in ways that words cannot
answers4: I see others have provided the Scripture. i think there will
be a rapture yet while and the place and how many i do no longer
understand. i won't be able to come to a decision if that is going to
likely be each and all the Christians, or all those with a organic
coronary heart or people who're relatively close to to God. I
additionally do no longer understand, while it comprises end time
stuff, no rely if the rapture is meant again till now or in the
process the Tribulation. some people have faith there will be better
than a million rapture, so as that in case you omit one you have got
time to get your existence stunning with God and pass up contained in
the subsequent one. i do no longer in my view think of it concerns. as
long as your coronary heart is suitable and you reside for God then
you extremely will heaven no rely while you're raptured or no longer.
So yeah, i think contained in the rapture yet i does no longer be
upset if i grew to become into incorrect.
Friday, 27 September 2019
Performing arts manager?
answers1: Performing arts manager A.K.A Stage Manager helps the
director with writing down blocking, checks props to see that they are
set in the right place, and sometimes helps with the construction.
director with writing down blocking, checks props to see that they are
set in the right place, and sometimes helps with the construction.
Thursday, 26 September 2019
Would a performing arts school help with acting?
answers1: I go to an arts school :) I'm in the dance program but I
know a bunch of people in drama and they're really good! They've
improved a lot since the beginning of grade 9 (we're in grade 10). I
think you should definitely go! The only bad thing is that you usually
get a lot more homework and assignments and it's more stressful. Like
at my school we have to have at least an 80% average in our art or
we're kicked out of the program. But if you really love what you're
doing, it's totally worth it.
answers2: if you go to a school, that would be training, not
experience. when you go on an audition the only thing that counts is
how well you audition. all anyone cares about is how well you perform,
not where you learned how to. you aren't going to get any acting jobs
based on where you went to school or for how long you went.
answers3: I work at an arts school. Drama is one of seven disciplines
our school offers. <br>
<br>
The strength of the teacher(s) makes a huge difference wherever you
go. Some traditional high schools have strong drama teachers. What
they lack is an overall intensive environment that may include field
trips, regional competitions, guest artists / instructors, and a core
group of similarly committed students. <br>
<br>
As you develop as a young actor, you'll need to read about the major
acting and directing theories, perhaps as part of your curriculum but
perhaps not. Reading about your discipline is always a good idea. <br>
<br>
Wherever you go, reach beyond what's offered at your school. Many of
our students attend summer intensives and act in community and
professional productions when their schedules allow. <br>
<br>
Work hard, learn the craft, and good luck.
know a bunch of people in drama and they're really good! They've
improved a lot since the beginning of grade 9 (we're in grade 10). I
think you should definitely go! The only bad thing is that you usually
get a lot more homework and assignments and it's more stressful. Like
at my school we have to have at least an 80% average in our art or
we're kicked out of the program. But if you really love what you're
doing, it's totally worth it.
answers2: if you go to a school, that would be training, not
experience. when you go on an audition the only thing that counts is
how well you audition. all anyone cares about is how well you perform,
not where you learned how to. you aren't going to get any acting jobs
based on where you went to school or for how long you went.
answers3: I work at an arts school. Drama is one of seven disciplines
our school offers. <br>
<br>
The strength of the teacher(s) makes a huge difference wherever you
go. Some traditional high schools have strong drama teachers. What
they lack is an overall intensive environment that may include field
trips, regional competitions, guest artists / instructors, and a core
group of similarly committed students. <br>
<br>
As you develop as a young actor, you'll need to read about the major
acting and directing theories, perhaps as part of your curriculum but
perhaps not. Reading about your discipline is always a good idea. <br>
<br>
Wherever you go, reach beyond what's offered at your school. Many of
our students attend summer intensives and act in community and
professional productions when their schedules allow. <br>
<br>
Work hard, learn the craft, and good luck.
Wednesday, 25 September 2019
United States History Question?
answers1: Summary below. <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-hawaii.html"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.buzzle.com/articles/a-brief-h...</a>
<br>
<a href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-hawaii.html"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.buzzle.com/articles/a-brief-h...</a>
Tuesday, 24 September 2019
why do we study cambodian history?
answers1: ask yourself, <br>
why do we study american history? <br>
why do we study spanish history? <br>
etc. <br>
why put the spot on cambodians...?
answers2: To get to know the rich colorful history of Cambodia. <br>
<br>
Peace...
answers3: We will need to learn it anyway when they inevitably become
the supreme rulers of the world.
why do we study american history? <br>
why do we study spanish history? <br>
etc. <br>
why put the spot on cambodians...?
answers2: To get to know the rich colorful history of Cambodia. <br>
<br>
Peace...
answers3: We will need to learn it anyway when they inevitably become
the supreme rulers of the world.
Monday, 23 September 2019
Can I check wifi iPod history?
answers1: Isnt there an history in safari?
answers2: You should be able to check out the recent history of what
has run through the wifi router by going into <br>
Computer, clicking Network on the left, then your router should appear
& you can right-click on it & open something along the lines of Device
Webpage. <br>
<br>
Somewhere on the page there may be a way to view the history once
you've logged in.
answers2: You should be able to check out the recent history of what
has run through the wifi router by going into <br>
Computer, clicking Network on the left, then your router should appear
& you can right-click on it & open something along the lines of Device
Webpage. <br>
<br>
Somewhere on the page there may be a way to view the history once
you've logged in.
Sunday, 22 September 2019
Facebook chat history?
answers1: ON there is nothing calles chat history or more Button, that
person might deleted the chat history, you ust open the window if
nothing appeared then that person had deleted the chat history :D
person might deleted the chat history, you ust open the window if
nothing appeared then that person had deleted the chat history :D
Saturday, 21 September 2019
alterant history stuffffffffffffffff....?
answers1: Either way is fine, "alternate or alternative history." Both
terms are correct. There are several authors who write alternative
history novels like Harry Turtledove. Check him out. <br>
<br>
As for enjoyment. Well its just fun to ponder the "what if?"
-logically speaking, there could be several futures depending on the
actions that you take. Like what if Julius Cesar hadn't become an
emperor? Your imagination could go anywhere with "what if." <br>
<br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_history <br>
<br>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=alternative+history&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
answers2: For every winner in History - for example Stalin - there's
always a loser (in Stalin's case,Trotsky).Alternative history examines
the 'what if..?' of history,and what the results might have been if
different decisions or actions had been taken by various people at
different times in history.This can help us understand cause and
effect much more clearly in terms of historical events,and helps us
learn from mistakes by looking at alternative policies and how they
may have worked out. <br>
A good example would be the policy of appeasement in Europe in the
1930s.This policy,when examined with hindsight,clearly encouraged
rather than deterred the likes of Hitler and Mussolini.So,after WW2
the West stood up to for example the Soviet Union,North Korea in the
Korean War,Milosevic in Yugoslavia and so on.
answers3: What is alternate history?
terms are correct. There are several authors who write alternative
history novels like Harry Turtledove. Check him out. <br>
<br>
As for enjoyment. Well its just fun to ponder the "what if?"
-logically speaking, there could be several futures depending on the
actions that you take. Like what if Julius Cesar hadn't become an
emperor? Your imagination could go anywhere with "what if." <br>
<br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_history <br>
<br>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=alternative+history&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
answers2: For every winner in History - for example Stalin - there's
always a loser (in Stalin's case,Trotsky).Alternative history examines
the 'what if..?' of history,and what the results might have been if
different decisions or actions had been taken by various people at
different times in history.This can help us understand cause and
effect much more clearly in terms of historical events,and helps us
learn from mistakes by looking at alternative policies and how they
may have worked out. <br>
A good example would be the policy of appeasement in Europe in the
1930s.This policy,when examined with hindsight,clearly encouraged
rather than deterred the likes of Hitler and Mussolini.So,after WW2
the West stood up to for example the Soviet Union,North Korea in the
Korean War,Milosevic in Yugoslavia and so on.
answers3: What is alternate history?
Friday, 20 September 2019
How can Joseph not be Jesus` real dad if The Bible gives 2 genealogies, which is normal for non-virgin birthed?
answers1: Therapy is available.
answers2: Joseph was a lineage of King David (Matthew & Luke). Since
Jesus was of a Virgin Conception, then Jesus is not a lineage of King
David. <br>
Some would say that Mary the mother of Jesus was also a lineage of
King David. <br>
"If the miraculous conception be true the Davidic descent could only
be through Mary. Was Mary descended from David
answers3: Even today a woman can be inseminated without going through
the whole sex process. I know, where's the fun in that? <br>
<br>
But to relate to the series finale of Justice League Unlimited, turns
out Terry McGinnis, AKA Batman, was created when Bruce Wayne had his
DNA extracted, Terry's father given what he thought was a flue shot.
It was actually a form of genetic engineering where Bruce Wayne's DNA
would find its way into Terry's father's sperm, and create a son for
Bruce Wayne to be the new Batman when Bruce is no longer capable.
answers4: The conflicting genealogies is subject to two different authors.
answers5: It happened that way.
answers2: Joseph was a lineage of King David (Matthew & Luke). Since
Jesus was of a Virgin Conception, then Jesus is not a lineage of King
David. <br>
Some would say that Mary the mother of Jesus was also a lineage of
King David. <br>
"If the miraculous conception be true the Davidic descent could only
be through Mary. Was Mary descended from David
answers3: Even today a woman can be inseminated without going through
the whole sex process. I know, where's the fun in that? <br>
<br>
But to relate to the series finale of Justice League Unlimited, turns
out Terry McGinnis, AKA Batman, was created when Bruce Wayne had his
DNA extracted, Terry's father given what he thought was a flue shot.
It was actually a form of genetic engineering where Bruce Wayne's DNA
would find its way into Terry's father's sperm, and create a son for
Bruce Wayne to be the new Batman when Bruce is no longer capable.
answers4: The conflicting genealogies is subject to two different authors.
answers5: It happened that way.
Thursday, 19 September 2019
What is a website that we can look up genealogy?
answers1: > first one to answer with a website that works will get
best answer. <br>
<br>
So, you prefer speed to quality? Some of us type slowly. You have at
least one that works now. Why would anyone bother to give you more?
answers2: You should start by asking all your living relatives about
family history. Then, armed with that information, you can go to your
public library and check to see if it has a genealogy department. Most
do nowadays; also, don't forget to check at community colleges,
universities, etc. Our public library has both www.ancestry.com and
www.heritagequest.com free for anyone to use (no library card
required). <br>
Another place to check out is any of the Mormon's Family History
Centers. They allow people to search for their family history (and,
NO, they don't try to convert you). <br>
A third option is one of the following websites: <br>
<a href="http://www.searchforancestors.com/..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.searchforancestors.com/...</a>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739...</a>
<br>
<br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.com/</a> <br>
<br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot archives dot gov/ <br>
<br>
http://www.familysearch.org/ <br>
<br>
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/... <br>
<br>
http://www.cyndislist.com/ <br>
<br>
www dot geni dot com/ <br>
<br>
Cyndi's has the most links to genealogy websites, whether ship's
passenger lists, ancestors from Africa, ancestors from the
Philippines, where ever and whatever. <br>
<br>
Of course, you may be successful by googling: "john doe, born 1620,
plimouth, massachusetts" as an example. <br>
<br>
Good luck and have fun! <br>
<br>
Check out this article on five great free genealogy websites: <br>
<br>
www dot associatedcontent dot com/article... <br>
<br>
Then there is the DNA test; if you decide you want to REALLY know
where your ancestors came from opt for the DNA test. Besides all the
mistakes that officials commonly make, from 10% to 20% of birth
certificates list the father wrong; that is, mama was doing the
hanky-panky and someone else was the REAL father. That won't show up
on the internet or in books; it WILL show up in DNA. <br>
I used www.familytreedna.com which works with the National Geographics
Genotype Program.
answers3: You can try the LDS Family Site, or you could contact you
local genealogy or history society, they are usually more than willing
to help people get started.
answers4: there are thousands of them. They work if you know how to
use them, and have patience to use more than one. <br>
www.rootsweb.com has a tutorial on finding ancestors and records.
answers5: Ancestry has the most data. You should be able to get back
to 1850 on 3/4ths of your lines in 10 - 300 hours, speread out over as
many nights and weekends as you want to devote to it, if you are white
and your ancestors were in the USA; 1870 if you are black, sadly. The
USA collection is $159 if you pay annually, which works out to $14 or
so per month. You might visit a Family History Center. They are
staffed with friendly volunteers, and, even though they are in Mormon
churches, they don't try to convert you. They can show you more in 3
hours than we could in a week of questions and answers.
answers6: I'd say that almost all of them want to sell something. It
is their reason to be. But they usually offer a variety of resource
that you can take advantage of. I suggest you take this from one, that
from another one, and make your own research. It becomes really funny!
<br>
I think the best one is FOOTNOTE.COM (<a
href="http://go.footnote.com/genealogy.php?xid=425/)"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://go.footnote.com/genealogy.php?xid...</a>
<br>
I listed a couple more that I used sometime.
answers7: If you want a good verifiable family tree, it requires work,
not just putting in a name and there it all is. If you saw
information on your mother's family and her ex husband in a family
tree, you don't know if the information is accurate or not. <br>
<br>
There are lots of websites. Ancestry.Com has been recommended. It
isn't free but your public library might have a subscription to it you
can use for free. <br>
<br>
However, you must distinguish between their excellent original source
records and their subscriber submitted family trees. Family trees on
ANY website must be viewed with caution. They are subscriber
submitted, by folks like you and me, very seldom documented or poorly
documented. You frequently will see different information on the same
people from different subscribers. Then you will see the absolute
same information on the same people from different subscribers, but
that doesn't mean it is correct. Too many people copy without
verifying. If you disagree with information someone has posted on
some of your family, those that run the websites will tell you that is
between you and the other subscriber. <br>
<br>
Ancest;ry.Com has all the U.S. censuses through 1930. The 1940 and
later are not available to the public yet. They have lots of military
enlistment and draft records. Also many immigration and land records.
<br>
They have transcribed the records but you can view the original images. <br>
There are errors in their transcriptions, particularly censuses, but
when you view the originals you will pity the transcribers. <br>
<br>
A good free source is a Family History Center at a Latter Day
Saints(Mormon) Church. They have records on people all over the
world, not just Mormons. In Salt Lake City, they have the world's
largest genealogical collection. Their FHCs can order microfilm for
you to view at a nominal fee. <br>
<br>
I have never had them to try and convert me or have I heard of them
doing that to anyone else that has used their resources. A lot of
their volunteers are not Mormon. Just visit their free website,
FamilySearch.org, to get the hours for the general public for the
nearest Mormon FHC. <br>
<br>
If you haven't done so get as much information from living family as
possible. Interview your seniors and tape them if they will let you.
Find out if any has any old family bibles. Ask to see and make copies
of birth, marriage and death certificates. Depending on the religious
faith, baptismal, first communion, confirmation and marriage
certificates from their church can be valuable.
answers8: If it is so very important, get a subscription to ancestry.com <br>
<br>
Otherwise try this <br>
<a href="http://www.cyndislist.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.cyndislist.com/</a>
answers9: Your public libraries will most likely have both
Ancestry.com and Heritage Quest.com free for anyone to use while at
the library and with a library card you can use Heritage Quest at
home. <br>
<br>
Another free online resource is U.S. GenWeb at: <a
href="http://www.usgenweb.org/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.usgenweb.org/</a> they have a
page for every state and everything is free. Then there is Rootsweb at
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/,"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/,</a> a
free site hosted by Ancestry.com where you can search for surnames and
leave queries on the message boards. Additionally, I would be remiss
if I didn't mention FamilySearch.org they have many free online
records and are digitizing more every day, all free. Their website is:
<a href="http://www.familysearch.org/."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.familysearch.org/.</a> Be sure to
check each state that you need information from as many have their own
projects, for example, the state of Missouri has a great website that
has many free source documents online at: http://www.sos.mo.gov/mdh/
and South Carolina has many free wills at
http://www.archivesindex.sc.gov/onlinear… <br>
<br>
Also, do not forget to check Cyndi's List at
http://www.cyndislist.com, which has many links for both free and paid
sites. <br>
<br>
I'm sure I could come up with a lot more but that should keep you busy
for a while and I think your question was what is a website that we
can look up genealogy for free…there should be lots of family history
to be found for free with all these websites.
best answer. <br>
<br>
So, you prefer speed to quality? Some of us type slowly. You have at
least one that works now. Why would anyone bother to give you more?
answers2: You should start by asking all your living relatives about
family history. Then, armed with that information, you can go to your
public library and check to see if it has a genealogy department. Most
do nowadays; also, don't forget to check at community colleges,
universities, etc. Our public library has both www.ancestry.com and
www.heritagequest.com free for anyone to use (no library card
required). <br>
Another place to check out is any of the Mormon's Family History
Centers. They allow people to search for their family history (and,
NO, they don't try to convert you). <br>
A third option is one of the following websites: <br>
<a href="http://www.searchforancestors.com/..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.searchforancestors.com/...</a>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739...</a>
<br>
<br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.com/</a> <br>
<br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot archives dot gov/ <br>
<br>
http://www.familysearch.org/ <br>
<br>
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/... <br>
<br>
http://www.cyndislist.com/ <br>
<br>
www dot geni dot com/ <br>
<br>
Cyndi's has the most links to genealogy websites, whether ship's
passenger lists, ancestors from Africa, ancestors from the
Philippines, where ever and whatever. <br>
<br>
Of course, you may be successful by googling: "john doe, born 1620,
plimouth, massachusetts" as an example. <br>
<br>
Good luck and have fun! <br>
<br>
Check out this article on five great free genealogy websites: <br>
<br>
www dot associatedcontent dot com/article... <br>
<br>
Then there is the DNA test; if you decide you want to REALLY know
where your ancestors came from opt for the DNA test. Besides all the
mistakes that officials commonly make, from 10% to 20% of birth
certificates list the father wrong; that is, mama was doing the
hanky-panky and someone else was the REAL father. That won't show up
on the internet or in books; it WILL show up in DNA. <br>
I used www.familytreedna.com which works with the National Geographics
Genotype Program.
answers3: You can try the LDS Family Site, or you could contact you
local genealogy or history society, they are usually more than willing
to help people get started.
answers4: there are thousands of them. They work if you know how to
use them, and have patience to use more than one. <br>
www.rootsweb.com has a tutorial on finding ancestors and records.
answers5: Ancestry has the most data. You should be able to get back
to 1850 on 3/4ths of your lines in 10 - 300 hours, speread out over as
many nights and weekends as you want to devote to it, if you are white
and your ancestors were in the USA; 1870 if you are black, sadly. The
USA collection is $159 if you pay annually, which works out to $14 or
so per month. You might visit a Family History Center. They are
staffed with friendly volunteers, and, even though they are in Mormon
churches, they don't try to convert you. They can show you more in 3
hours than we could in a week of questions and answers.
answers6: I'd say that almost all of them want to sell something. It
is their reason to be. But they usually offer a variety of resource
that you can take advantage of. I suggest you take this from one, that
from another one, and make your own research. It becomes really funny!
<br>
I think the best one is FOOTNOTE.COM (<a
href="http://go.footnote.com/genealogy.php?xid=425/)"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://go.footnote.com/genealogy.php?xid...</a>
<br>
I listed a couple more that I used sometime.
answers7: If you want a good verifiable family tree, it requires work,
not just putting in a name and there it all is. If you saw
information on your mother's family and her ex husband in a family
tree, you don't know if the information is accurate or not. <br>
<br>
There are lots of websites. Ancestry.Com has been recommended. It
isn't free but your public library might have a subscription to it you
can use for free. <br>
<br>
However, you must distinguish between their excellent original source
records and their subscriber submitted family trees. Family trees on
ANY website must be viewed with caution. They are subscriber
submitted, by folks like you and me, very seldom documented or poorly
documented. You frequently will see different information on the same
people from different subscribers. Then you will see the absolute
same information on the same people from different subscribers, but
that doesn't mean it is correct. Too many people copy without
verifying. If you disagree with information someone has posted on
some of your family, those that run the websites will tell you that is
between you and the other subscriber. <br>
<br>
Ancest;ry.Com has all the U.S. censuses through 1930. The 1940 and
later are not available to the public yet. They have lots of military
enlistment and draft records. Also many immigration and land records.
<br>
They have transcribed the records but you can view the original images. <br>
There are errors in their transcriptions, particularly censuses, but
when you view the originals you will pity the transcribers. <br>
<br>
A good free source is a Family History Center at a Latter Day
Saints(Mormon) Church. They have records on people all over the
world, not just Mormons. In Salt Lake City, they have the world's
largest genealogical collection. Their FHCs can order microfilm for
you to view at a nominal fee. <br>
<br>
I have never had them to try and convert me or have I heard of them
doing that to anyone else that has used their resources. A lot of
their volunteers are not Mormon. Just visit their free website,
FamilySearch.org, to get the hours for the general public for the
nearest Mormon FHC. <br>
<br>
If you haven't done so get as much information from living family as
possible. Interview your seniors and tape them if they will let you.
Find out if any has any old family bibles. Ask to see and make copies
of birth, marriage and death certificates. Depending on the religious
faith, baptismal, first communion, confirmation and marriage
certificates from their church can be valuable.
answers8: If it is so very important, get a subscription to ancestry.com <br>
<br>
Otherwise try this <br>
<a href="http://www.cyndislist.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.cyndislist.com/</a>
answers9: Your public libraries will most likely have both
Ancestry.com and Heritage Quest.com free for anyone to use while at
the library and with a library card you can use Heritage Quest at
home. <br>
<br>
Another free online resource is U.S. GenWeb at: <a
href="http://www.usgenweb.org/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.usgenweb.org/</a> they have a
page for every state and everything is free. Then there is Rootsweb at
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/,"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/,</a> a
free site hosted by Ancestry.com where you can search for surnames and
leave queries on the message boards. Additionally, I would be remiss
if I didn't mention FamilySearch.org they have many free online
records and are digitizing more every day, all free. Their website is:
<a href="http://www.familysearch.org/."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.familysearch.org/.</a> Be sure to
check each state that you need information from as many have their own
projects, for example, the state of Missouri has a great website that
has many free source documents online at: http://www.sos.mo.gov/mdh/
and South Carolina has many free wills at
http://www.archivesindex.sc.gov/onlinear… <br>
<br>
Also, do not forget to check Cyndi's List at
http://www.cyndislist.com, which has many links for both free and paid
sites. <br>
<br>
I'm sure I could come up with a lot more but that should keep you busy
for a while and I think your question was what is a website that we
can look up genealogy for free…there should be lots of family history
to be found for free with all these websites.
Wednesday, 18 September 2019
Why isn't Abel listed in the Genealogy of Adam?
answers1: He didn't have any children His brother killed him so his
branch didn't go any where.
answers2: The genealogy is usually listed from Adam through to Jesus.
Jesus was descended from Seth, the third son of Adam. That's why Cain
and Abel don't get a mention, because their line isn't traced to
Jesus. Cain's descendants are listed for a bit in Genesis, but that
stops happening some time before the flood of Noah's time. They
probably all died at that time. Abel isn't listed because he had no
children. It's Adam - Abel - nothing. And seeing as both their stories
are already told in the Bible, it seems sort of pointless to write and
official geneology for that line.
answers3: Abel didn't have children because he died.
answers4: Abel never had children.
answers5: The Savior did pass Abel's line.
answers6: Cain murdered Abel before Adam's third son, Seth, was born. <br>
Cain ruled himself out of the genealogy because of what he did and God
banishing him. <br>
Abel was ruled out o the genealogy because he died before fathering
children himself. <br>
<br>
These genealogies need not be complete, in the sense that we like to
draw up family trees today. Their purpose is to trace a line of
descent. If a son had no descendants, he was not included, as far as I
can tell. <br>
<br>
That might account for why Adam's line of descent in Genesis chapter 5
begins with his third son, Seth, and it goes all the way to Noah.
Chapter 5 connects God's purpose in creation with Seth's line rather
than Cain's. (The descendants of Cain are mentioned in Genesis
4:17-24.) <br>
<br>
The Genesis genealogies are designed to contrast the ways that human
culture spread, some in rebellion against God and some in obedience to
God. In Genesis, the history of the rejected branch is generally
explained before carrying forward the line that led to Israel. But
Abel was murdered before he could contribute to that line of descent.
answers7: Because Abel did not Father any children and continue the bloodline
answers8: He didn't have any offspring.
branch didn't go any where.
answers2: The genealogy is usually listed from Adam through to Jesus.
Jesus was descended from Seth, the third son of Adam. That's why Cain
and Abel don't get a mention, because their line isn't traced to
Jesus. Cain's descendants are listed for a bit in Genesis, but that
stops happening some time before the flood of Noah's time. They
probably all died at that time. Abel isn't listed because he had no
children. It's Adam - Abel - nothing. And seeing as both their stories
are already told in the Bible, it seems sort of pointless to write and
official geneology for that line.
answers3: Abel didn't have children because he died.
answers4: Abel never had children.
answers5: The Savior did pass Abel's line.
answers6: Cain murdered Abel before Adam's third son, Seth, was born. <br>
Cain ruled himself out of the genealogy because of what he did and God
banishing him. <br>
Abel was ruled out o the genealogy because he died before fathering
children himself. <br>
<br>
These genealogies need not be complete, in the sense that we like to
draw up family trees today. Their purpose is to trace a line of
descent. If a son had no descendants, he was not included, as far as I
can tell. <br>
<br>
That might account for why Adam's line of descent in Genesis chapter 5
begins with his third son, Seth, and it goes all the way to Noah.
Chapter 5 connects God's purpose in creation with Seth's line rather
than Cain's. (The descendants of Cain are mentioned in Genesis
4:17-24.) <br>
<br>
The Genesis genealogies are designed to contrast the ways that human
culture spread, some in rebellion against God and some in obedience to
God. In Genesis, the history of the rejected branch is generally
explained before carrying forward the line that led to Israel. But
Abel was murdered before he could contribute to that line of descent.
answers7: Because Abel did not Father any children and continue the bloodline
answers8: He didn't have any offspring.
Monday, 16 September 2019
Can somebody help me with genealogy research stuff?
answers1: Ancestors are "bloodline". <br>
Names are not biological; people are. If your mom was adopted, what
you really need to know is who were her parents? The name she knows
may be a name provided by adoption agency, adopting parents, or who
knows what. <br>
You do not need to ever meet your dad; all you need is information,
name, dates of birth/marriage/death, etc. <br>
People keep claiming that living persons are not in Ancestry, but that
is not true. I am in there, my wife, all of my siblings and their
spouses and some of the offspring of my siblings and I. I have
protested, but to no avail. (Just like Yahoo!..they make their rules
fit however they want.) <br>
If you have interenet access, you can access all kinds of records,
trees, etc. For those sites you need to pay for, try your local
public library. <br>
Here is my "cut & paste" list of sites: <br>
You should start by asking all your living relatives about family
history. Then, armed with that information, you can go to your public
library and check to see if it has a genealogy department. Most do
nowadays; also, don't forget to check at community colleges,
universities, etc. Our public library has both www.ancestry.com and
www.heritagequest.com free for anyone to use (no library card
required). <br>
Another place to check out is any of the Mormon's Family History
Centers. They allow people to search for their family history (and,
NO, they don't try to convert you). <br>
A third option is one of the following websites: <br>
<a href="http://www.searchforancestors.com/..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.searchforancestors.com/...</a>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739...</a>
<br>
<br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.com/</a> <br>
<br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot archives dot gov/ <br>
<br>
http://www.familysearch.org/ <br>
<br>
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/... <br>
<br>
http://www.cyndislist.com/ <br>
<br>
www dot geni dot com/ <br>
<br>
Cyndi's has the most links to genealogy websites, whether ship's
passenger lists, ancestors from Africa, ancestors from the
Philippines, where ever and whatever. <br>
<br>
Of course, you may be successful by googling: "john doe, born 1620,
plimouth, massachusetts" as an example. <br>
<br>
Good luck and have fun! <br>
<br>
Check out this article on five great free genealogy websites: <br>
<br>
www dot associatedcontent dot com/article... <br>
<br>
Then there is the DNA test; if you decide you want to REALLY know
where your ancestors came from opt for the DNA test. Besides all the
mistakes that officials commonly make, from 10% to 20% of birth
certificates list the father wrong; that is, mama was doing the
hanky-panky and someone else was the REAL father. That won't show up
on the internet or in books; it WILL show up in DNA. <br>
I used www.familytreedna.com which works with the National Geographics
Genotype Program.
answers2: No one is going to send you their password. Sheesh. <br>
<br>
and, just to help you out... genealogy sites are not GOING TO HAVE
you. They don't include living persons. Yahoo also prohibits it. <br>
If you need a question answered about one of your ancestors, who is
dead.. post the question.
answers3: It says you don't exist because you are living. They do not
post information about people until they have been dead for a minimum
of 10 years. I'm Mormon and the free system that everyone can access
says I don't exist. <br>
<br>
However, go to your local LDS meeting house that has a Family History
Center and the person there can help you get registered as a
non-member on the secured site. Once you register, you will enter
your information and then you will exist. You will only be able to
access information about your ancestry and no one else's <br>
<br>
Good luck!
answers4: Genealogy websites like ancestry.com and the Mormon's
familysearch don't include the names of living people. So you won't
find yourself, or your parents, and probably not your grandparents.
You'll need to know the names of your great-grandparents, or an
ancestor who was alive in 1930, before websites will be any help. <br>
<br>
For most people, getting information about your great-grandparents
means talking to your family members. But in your case, with a mom
who was adopted and a dad you've never met, that may be a challenge.
<br>
<br>
Does your mom know the names of her biological parents? Does she, or
anyone, know how to contact your dad or any of his relatives? If
you'll post another question and give us the details on this, someone
may be able to give you some suggestions on how to proceed.
answers5: If you edit your question, by adding your information ( if
your parents are both still living, that is how they will be
listed--"Living Jones" or "Living Schmitt". This is done to protect
their identity. Until they pass away, their names will not be found,
and neither will yours until your death, on ancestry websites.That is
why you don't exist on familysearch.org. There could be people listed
with your name, but not your birthdate), but start with your
grandparents. If they are also still alive, ask about their parents
(your great-grandparents) and start from there. You can add the
current information about your family as it comes along. <br>
I also have a world deluxe membership to ancestry.com; a membership
to worldvitalrecords.com; etc. If you don't want to edit this
question, my email is in my profile. Using someone else's user
name/password can only lead to a deep pile of you-know-what, and get
one or the other of us into biiiiiiiiiiig trouble.
answers6: I can understand your frustration, but you can find census
records and other documents online for free if you know where to look.
Start by narrowing down the place and then start searching for vital
records in that place. They may not have them online yet, but
sometimes they have catalogs of their documents. <br>
<br>
What you need are some free resources. Check out these free genealogy
websites, you might just find what you are looking for.
answers7: Because you are still alive you will have difficulty finding
info through the Mormon site. It is against policy to give out ones
user name and password. We all struggle paying for our subscriptions.
<br>
Send me the full info and places (states and cities) and dates and
I'll see what I find! Please give <br>
Name <br>
Birth date <br>
Place born or lived last known. <br>
Also who they are. Make it easier to have spellings correct and all
data with each person! <br>
Also state what it is you want to know!
answers8: check the following websites: <br>
http://www.searchforancestors.com/... <br>
http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739… <br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
http://www.rootsweb.com/ <br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
http://www.replacementbirthcertificate.org <br>
www dot archives dot gov/
answers9: Have you contacted the Mormon Church in your area? If you
call the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints you can ask them
where the nearest Family History Center is to your house. Go there
when they are open and you will receive free assistance and free
access to Ancestry, Footnote.com and numerous other sites. It sounds
like you need some direction and that is a FREE place to get that
direction. You do not have to be a member of their church to use it.
<br>
<br>
Good Luck! <br>
The History Man <br>
<a href="http://wwwhistoryman.blogspot.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://wwwhistoryman.blogspot.com/</a>
Names are not biological; people are. If your mom was adopted, what
you really need to know is who were her parents? The name she knows
may be a name provided by adoption agency, adopting parents, or who
knows what. <br>
You do not need to ever meet your dad; all you need is information,
name, dates of birth/marriage/death, etc. <br>
People keep claiming that living persons are not in Ancestry, but that
is not true. I am in there, my wife, all of my siblings and their
spouses and some of the offspring of my siblings and I. I have
protested, but to no avail. (Just like Yahoo!..they make their rules
fit however they want.) <br>
If you have interenet access, you can access all kinds of records,
trees, etc. For those sites you need to pay for, try your local
public library. <br>
Here is my "cut & paste" list of sites: <br>
You should start by asking all your living relatives about family
history. Then, armed with that information, you can go to your public
library and check to see if it has a genealogy department. Most do
nowadays; also, don't forget to check at community colleges,
universities, etc. Our public library has both www.ancestry.com and
www.heritagequest.com free for anyone to use (no library card
required). <br>
Another place to check out is any of the Mormon's Family History
Centers. They allow people to search for their family history (and,
NO, they don't try to convert you). <br>
A third option is one of the following websites: <br>
<a href="http://www.searchforancestors.com/..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.searchforancestors.com/...</a>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739..."
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739...</a>
<br>
<br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.rootsweb.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.rootsweb.com/</a> <br>
<br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
<br>
www dot archives dot gov/ <br>
<br>
http://www.familysearch.org/ <br>
<br>
http://www.accessgenealogy.com/... <br>
<br>
http://www.cyndislist.com/ <br>
<br>
www dot geni dot com/ <br>
<br>
Cyndi's has the most links to genealogy websites, whether ship's
passenger lists, ancestors from Africa, ancestors from the
Philippines, where ever and whatever. <br>
<br>
Of course, you may be successful by googling: "john doe, born 1620,
plimouth, massachusetts" as an example. <br>
<br>
Good luck and have fun! <br>
<br>
Check out this article on five great free genealogy websites: <br>
<br>
www dot associatedcontent dot com/article... <br>
<br>
Then there is the DNA test; if you decide you want to REALLY know
where your ancestors came from opt for the DNA test. Besides all the
mistakes that officials commonly make, from 10% to 20% of birth
certificates list the father wrong; that is, mama was doing the
hanky-panky and someone else was the REAL father. That won't show up
on the internet or in books; it WILL show up in DNA. <br>
I used www.familytreedna.com which works with the National Geographics
Genotype Program.
answers2: No one is going to send you their password. Sheesh. <br>
<br>
and, just to help you out... genealogy sites are not GOING TO HAVE
you. They don't include living persons. Yahoo also prohibits it. <br>
If you need a question answered about one of your ancestors, who is
dead.. post the question.
answers3: It says you don't exist because you are living. They do not
post information about people until they have been dead for a minimum
of 10 years. I'm Mormon and the free system that everyone can access
says I don't exist. <br>
<br>
However, go to your local LDS meeting house that has a Family History
Center and the person there can help you get registered as a
non-member on the secured site. Once you register, you will enter
your information and then you will exist. You will only be able to
access information about your ancestry and no one else's <br>
<br>
Good luck!
answers4: Genealogy websites like ancestry.com and the Mormon's
familysearch don't include the names of living people. So you won't
find yourself, or your parents, and probably not your grandparents.
You'll need to know the names of your great-grandparents, or an
ancestor who was alive in 1930, before websites will be any help. <br>
<br>
For most people, getting information about your great-grandparents
means talking to your family members. But in your case, with a mom
who was adopted and a dad you've never met, that may be a challenge.
<br>
<br>
Does your mom know the names of her biological parents? Does she, or
anyone, know how to contact your dad or any of his relatives? If
you'll post another question and give us the details on this, someone
may be able to give you some suggestions on how to proceed.
answers5: If you edit your question, by adding your information ( if
your parents are both still living, that is how they will be
listed--"Living Jones" or "Living Schmitt". This is done to protect
their identity. Until they pass away, their names will not be found,
and neither will yours until your death, on ancestry websites.That is
why you don't exist on familysearch.org. There could be people listed
with your name, but not your birthdate), but start with your
grandparents. If they are also still alive, ask about their parents
(your great-grandparents) and start from there. You can add the
current information about your family as it comes along. <br>
I also have a world deluxe membership to ancestry.com; a membership
to worldvitalrecords.com; etc. If you don't want to edit this
question, my email is in my profile. Using someone else's user
name/password can only lead to a deep pile of you-know-what, and get
one or the other of us into biiiiiiiiiiig trouble.
answers6: I can understand your frustration, but you can find census
records and other documents online for free if you know where to look.
Start by narrowing down the place and then start searching for vital
records in that place. They may not have them online yet, but
sometimes they have catalogs of their documents. <br>
<br>
What you need are some free resources. Check out these free genealogy
websites, you might just find what you are looking for.
answers7: Because you are still alive you will have difficulty finding
info through the Mormon site. It is against policy to give out ones
user name and password. We all struggle paying for our subscriptions.
<br>
Send me the full info and places (states and cities) and dates and
I'll see what I find! Please give <br>
Name <br>
Birth date <br>
Place born or lived last known. <br>
Also who they are. Make it easier to have spellings correct and all
data with each person! <br>
Also state what it is you want to know!
answers8: check the following websites: <br>
http://www.searchforancestors.com/... <br>
http://www.censusrecords.net/?o_xid=2739… <br>
www dot usgenweb dot com/ <br>
www dot census dot gov/ <br>
http://www.rootsweb.com/ <br>
www dot ukgenweb dot com/ <br>
http://www.replacementbirthcertificate.org <br>
www dot archives dot gov/
answers9: Have you contacted the Mormon Church in your area? If you
call the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints you can ask them
where the nearest Family History Center is to your house. Go there
when they are open and you will receive free assistance and free
access to Ancestry, Footnote.com and numerous other sites. It sounds
like you need some direction and that is a FREE place to get that
direction. You do not have to be a member of their church to use it.
<br>
<br>
Good Luck! <br>
The History Man <br>
<a href="http://wwwhistoryman.blogspot.com/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://wwwhistoryman.blogspot.com/</a>
Sunday, 15 September 2019
how do you say "dance" in spanish?
answers1: To dance: Bailar <br>
I dance: Bailo <br>
Will you dance with me?: Quesieras bailar con migo?
answers2: To dance bailar <br>
A dance un baile
answers3: you say dance in spanish like this "bailar" pronounced (bah-elahr)
answers4: to dance (verb) is bailar
answers5: Bailar
answers6: a dance = un baile <br>
to dance = bailar.
answers7: bailar
answers8: to dance- bailar <br>
a dance- baile
answers9: To dance ( bailar ) <br>
I dance ( Yo bailo ) <br>
I will dance ( Yo bailare )
answers10: DANCE: baile <br>
TO DANCE: bailar
I dance: Bailo <br>
Will you dance with me?: Quesieras bailar con migo?
answers2: To dance bailar <br>
A dance un baile
answers3: you say dance in spanish like this "bailar" pronounced (bah-elahr)
answers4: to dance (verb) is bailar
answers5: Bailar
answers6: a dance = un baile <br>
to dance = bailar.
answers7: bailar
answers8: to dance- bailar <br>
a dance- baile
answers9: To dance ( bailar ) <br>
I dance ( Yo bailo ) <br>
I will dance ( Yo bailare )
answers10: DANCE: baile <br>
TO DANCE: bailar
What kind of dance is this?
answers1: It should be Samba...Move it, shake it and thrill you with
all ahaaa...Dance at the beat...Sounds so circulate...rapid and speed
in a synchronized approach...Both dancing at the beats of drums and
bazz...And counting numbers on Mambo quantity 5... With the whole ball
room jst gaizing on us...and also you and me worried with each and
every different and misplaced in track...And flowing with the
rythm...and ignoring the leisure..All I consider the motion of your
eyes and flashing among each and every others eyes... Rubbling,
Bubbling and cuddling each and every others frame...Thats how it
should be...And Dance Like Dirty Dancing:)
answers2: You call is b-boying or b-girling basically its break dance! <br>
Watch So You Think You Can Dance to learn about more dance styles!
answers3: It's street dance/hip hop and break dancing . (:
answers4: Street dance
all ahaaa...Dance at the beat...Sounds so circulate...rapid and speed
in a synchronized approach...Both dancing at the beats of drums and
bazz...And counting numbers on Mambo quantity 5... With the whole ball
room jst gaizing on us...and also you and me worried with each and
every different and misplaced in track...And flowing with the
rythm...and ignoring the leisure..All I consider the motion of your
eyes and flashing among each and every others eyes... Rubbling,
Bubbling and cuddling each and every others frame...Thats how it
should be...And Dance Like Dirty Dancing:)
answers2: You call is b-boying or b-girling basically its break dance! <br>
Watch So You Think You Can Dance to learn about more dance styles!
answers3: It's street dance/hip hop and break dancing . (:
answers4: Street dance
Saturday, 14 September 2019
Friday, 13 September 2019
I have a project on Sousta dance in dance class?
answers1: People usually dance while a lyre, violin or mandolin is
playing. <br>
"There are elements of eroticism and courtship acted out in the dance,
which is usually performed by pairs of men and women dancing opposite.
Another form is where all the dancers in a row follow the first dancer
who moves in complex patterns. Almost every island of Aegean has a
sousta dance"
playing. <br>
"There are elements of eroticism and courtship acted out in the dance,
which is usually performed by pairs of men and women dancing opposite.
Another form is where all the dancers in a row follow the first dancer
who moves in complex patterns. Almost every island of Aegean has a
sousta dance"
Thursday, 12 September 2019
Dancing for Ladies?
answers1: lol yes
answers2: depends on what kind of dancing or what music. If it is
something that I can really move to with my boyfriend, we both end up
in the same position. Lol
answers3: no....my boyfriend gets aroused :-)
answers4: hmm no
answers5: Sometimes very much so.
answers6: a guy dancing with me is honeslty one of the biggest turn
ons ever. <br>
Basically any time of dancing to. <br>
unless hes a reallly bad dancer then...no but i can always teach him
dancing is hot
answers2: depends on what kind of dancing or what music. If it is
something that I can really move to with my boyfriend, we both end up
in the same position. Lol
answers3: no....my boyfriend gets aroused :-)
answers4: hmm no
answers5: Sometimes very much so.
answers6: a guy dancing with me is honeslty one of the biggest turn
ons ever. <br>
Basically any time of dancing to. <br>
unless hes a reallly bad dancer then...no but i can always teach him
dancing is hot
Wednesday, 11 September 2019
Is there any authors on here tonight?
answers1: I am - I have published two children's books, one young
adult novel and five adult mysteries.
answers2: You might want to try to phrase that using correct grammar
if you want published authors to take you seriously. Also, why do you
ask?
adult novel and five adult mysteries.
answers2: You might want to try to phrase that using correct grammar
if you want published authors to take you seriously. Also, why do you
ask?
Tuesday, 10 September 2019
Who is the most translated woman author in history?
answers1: Part 1, I would say Ruth, of the Book in the Bible by that
name, who married a man named Boaz. (can't say for certain that she
was the author...hold on...well, tradition says that the prophet
Samuel wrote Ruth, and the book itself does not name the
author)...strike one <br>
<br>
Part 2, My guess is either Robert Frost, Oswald Chambers, or Thomas
Jefferson. (likely strike 2)
answers2: Probably Agatha Christie.
answers3: Ellen G White's Steps To Christ is translated in over 165
different languages.
answers4: I'm guessing you are going to claim it is some SDA person,
probably Ellen White, but will be unable to substantiate it because
you don't care about facts...only creating division. <br>
<br>
So to placate you, it MUST be ELLEN WHITE!!!!! <br>
<br>
Yeah, That's Right <br>
<br>
You failed to note "non-fiction" in your question...I'm pretty sure
many fictional writers are out translated... <br>
<br>
Edit: I did some research and, surprise, surprise, Wiki article cites
"White is the most translated female non-fiction author in the history
of literature, as well as the most translated American non-fiction
author of either gender." but the citation referenced sends you to
White's estate website. Seems kind of self-serving, doesn't it?
answers5: Probably Enid Blyton and L. Ron Hubbard.
answers6: Translated Woman
answers7: Sarah Palin would be the most translated if she could read and write.
answers8: Rowling must be on that list, as far as Americans go, no idea
answers9: Ellen White <br>
<br>
thumbs down?? paul harvey talked of her writing on his radio show and
also made mention that the library of congress states that she is the
most translated women author in America and possibly the world. "Don't
know her? Then get to know her; and that is the rest of the story".
from Paul Harvey!
answers10: 1. Agatha Christie <br>
2. Walt Disney <br>
<br>
Just checked up on it according to this website: <br>
http://www.jahsonic.com/IndexTranslationum.html
name, who married a man named Boaz. (can't say for certain that she
was the author...hold on...well, tradition says that the prophet
Samuel wrote Ruth, and the book itself does not name the
author)...strike one <br>
<br>
Part 2, My guess is either Robert Frost, Oswald Chambers, or Thomas
Jefferson. (likely strike 2)
answers2: Probably Agatha Christie.
answers3: Ellen G White's Steps To Christ is translated in over 165
different languages.
answers4: I'm guessing you are going to claim it is some SDA person,
probably Ellen White, but will be unable to substantiate it because
you don't care about facts...only creating division. <br>
<br>
So to placate you, it MUST be ELLEN WHITE!!!!! <br>
<br>
Yeah, That's Right <br>
<br>
You failed to note "non-fiction" in your question...I'm pretty sure
many fictional writers are out translated... <br>
<br>
Edit: I did some research and, surprise, surprise, Wiki article cites
"White is the most translated female non-fiction author in the history
of literature, as well as the most translated American non-fiction
author of either gender." but the citation referenced sends you to
White's estate website. Seems kind of self-serving, doesn't it?
answers5: Probably Enid Blyton and L. Ron Hubbard.
answers6: Translated Woman
answers7: Sarah Palin would be the most translated if she could read and write.
answers8: Rowling must be on that list, as far as Americans go, no idea
answers9: Ellen White <br>
<br>
thumbs down?? paul harvey talked of her writing on his radio show and
also made mention that the library of congress states that she is the
most translated women author in America and possibly the world. "Don't
know her? Then get to know her; and that is the rest of the story".
from Paul Harvey!
answers10: 1. Agatha Christie <br>
2. Walt Disney <br>
<br>
Just checked up on it according to this website: <br>
http://www.jahsonic.com/IndexTranslationum.html
Monday, 9 September 2019
Does an author's words shape a time period?
answers1: Are you talking about setting the mood in a book or other
writing? An effective writer does his research and uses grammar and
vernacular of the time period he/she is trying to define. <br>
<br>
Otherwise, the time period the author lives in definitely shapes the
author's words. For example, Mark Twain's writing are controversial
in some circles for the language he uses describing black people. At
the time he wrote Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
and for the time period he was writing about, the language he used was
acceptable AND he was making a point. Not many authors would use that
type of language now.
answers2: It depends on why he is writing. <br>
She can shape a period if she is crusading for a cause; eg, 'Uncle
Tom's Cabin' versus slavery. <br>
<br>
You could argue equally validly, however, that it was slavery which
motivated Harriet Beecher Stowe to write the book. <br>
<br>
In socially conscious books , the problems exist first. <br>
I imagine in Dectective stories, Romances and Science fiction, then
the author shapes his setting at will. <br>
Historical novels and Biographies would be regulated by the times, however. <br>
<br>
Consequently, your question, as it stands, is too broad to be answered
definitely.
answers3: What happens in a time period doesn't change just because an
author has written falsely about it. An author has creative license,
but not a license to create a tangential universe.
writing? An effective writer does his research and uses grammar and
vernacular of the time period he/she is trying to define. <br>
<br>
Otherwise, the time period the author lives in definitely shapes the
author's words. For example, Mark Twain's writing are controversial
in some circles for the language he uses describing black people. At
the time he wrote Tom Sawyer and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
and for the time period he was writing about, the language he used was
acceptable AND he was making a point. Not many authors would use that
type of language now.
answers2: It depends on why he is writing. <br>
She can shape a period if she is crusading for a cause; eg, 'Uncle
Tom's Cabin' versus slavery. <br>
<br>
You could argue equally validly, however, that it was slavery which
motivated Harriet Beecher Stowe to write the book. <br>
<br>
In socially conscious books , the problems exist first. <br>
I imagine in Dectective stories, Romances and Science fiction, then
the author shapes his setting at will. <br>
Historical novels and Biographies would be regulated by the times, however. <br>
<br>
Consequently, your question, as it stands, is too broad to be answered
definitely.
answers3: What happens in a time period doesn't change just because an
author has written falsely about it. An author has creative license,
but not a license to create a tangential universe.
Sunday, 8 September 2019
Youngest Child Author?
answers1: When i was 11 years old i wrote a book and now I'm 13 i have
written about 4 books which people enjoy. Your not too young. The
youngest author lives in England and is 7 years old...but he has a
brain of a very smart person.
answers2: 7 year old from England. Wrote book for other kids on how
to cope when parents divorce. A very simple book. <br>
<br>
Age is not as important as talent, a good idea and timing.
answers3: The Youngest author is 4 years old. Look it up in the
Guinness Book of Records. She's Brazilian and published the book in
the 60s. <br>
The youngest modern author, that published their book in the 21st
Century is 7 and lives in England.
answers4: Are you asking for WHO the youngest author is? <br>
<br>
If not, and it's just some sort of age limit, then I don't think there
is one. Just as long as you write something people will actually want
to read. Also something that you're sure will get published someday.
answers5: You can write at any age. However, the youngest author I
know of is Daisy Ashford, who wrote "The Young Visiters" when she was
just nine. It was published in 1919 when she was 38 years old. <br>
<br>
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Visiters-Daisy-Ashford/dp/0701127252 <br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_Ashford
answers6: I don't think there is one - certainly many kids far younger
than you have had short stories published in anthologies of kids work.
<br>
<br>
In any case, don't worry about it. You are not an author. Planning to
write a book does not make someone an author. Writing it makes them an
author.
written about 4 books which people enjoy. Your not too young. The
youngest author lives in England and is 7 years old...but he has a
brain of a very smart person.
answers2: 7 year old from England. Wrote book for other kids on how
to cope when parents divorce. A very simple book. <br>
<br>
Age is not as important as talent, a good idea and timing.
answers3: The Youngest author is 4 years old. Look it up in the
Guinness Book of Records. She's Brazilian and published the book in
the 60s. <br>
The youngest modern author, that published their book in the 21st
Century is 7 and lives in England.
answers4: Are you asking for WHO the youngest author is? <br>
<br>
If not, and it's just some sort of age limit, then I don't think there
is one. Just as long as you write something people will actually want
to read. Also something that you're sure will get published someday.
answers5: You can write at any age. However, the youngest author I
know of is Daisy Ashford, who wrote "The Young Visiters" when she was
just nine. It was published in 1919 when she was 38 years old. <br>
<br>
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Visiters-Daisy-Ashford/dp/0701127252 <br>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisy_Ashford
answers6: I don't think there is one - certainly many kids far younger
than you have had short stories published in anthologies of kids work.
<br>
<br>
In any case, don't worry about it. You are not an author. Planning to
write a book does not make someone an author. Writing it makes them an
author.
Saturday, 7 September 2019
should we really kill the author?
answers1: No.
answers2: No I think the author plays as much of a role as the persona
they take on (that of the narrator). Knowing author's backgrounds can
help with figuring out their message or the reason why something
happened in a plot.
answers3: no
answers4: I wouldn't like people to read anything I've written and
consciously compare it to anything they might know about me. <br>
I don't consider the author when I read any type of text. If the text
is good enough you should be lost in it and not have to consider the
author. Unless of course it's autobiographical. Alternatively I think
that any character in the text should stand on their own and when
reading, you should forget that it was actually written by someone.
answers5: Up to a point, yes. In the weak form (the strong form being
that the author is totally irrelevant) it's simply a stance that the
author's intended meaning isn't a privileged "correct" one that trumps
other possible ways to analyse the text. <br>
<br>
Objections to "the author is dead" are also largely misplaced, since
the reality is that we routinely interpret books on that basis (i.e.
without knowledge of the author's intention). This is especially the
case with older books where the historical context isn't widely known.
For instance, Charles Kingsley's "The Water Babies" is widely read
without the knowledge that it was a complicated social and scientific
satire. Stella Gibbons' "Cold Comfort Farm" is a detailed satire on a
number of specific novels and authors of the time (such as Mary Webb)
but is mostly read as an entertaining rustic comedy mostly without
that knowledge.
answers6: um.. no. y do that?
answers7: I personally don't think so, but why don't you try?
answers8: No, the text won't make sense without realising the authors
intentions.
answers9: I think its important to have some insight into the author
if we really want to recognise his talent and beliefs i.e Kurt
Vonnegut in Slaughter-house Five............a book about the horrors
of Dresden bombing, without the knowledge that Vonnegut was present at
the bombings one could easily label the book immature and maudlin
answers2: No I think the author plays as much of a role as the persona
they take on (that of the narrator). Knowing author's backgrounds can
help with figuring out their message or the reason why something
happened in a plot.
answers3: no
answers4: I wouldn't like people to read anything I've written and
consciously compare it to anything they might know about me. <br>
I don't consider the author when I read any type of text. If the text
is good enough you should be lost in it and not have to consider the
author. Unless of course it's autobiographical. Alternatively I think
that any character in the text should stand on their own and when
reading, you should forget that it was actually written by someone.
answers5: Up to a point, yes. In the weak form (the strong form being
that the author is totally irrelevant) it's simply a stance that the
author's intended meaning isn't a privileged "correct" one that trumps
other possible ways to analyse the text. <br>
<br>
Objections to "the author is dead" are also largely misplaced, since
the reality is that we routinely interpret books on that basis (i.e.
without knowledge of the author's intention). This is especially the
case with older books where the historical context isn't widely known.
For instance, Charles Kingsley's "The Water Babies" is widely read
without the knowledge that it was a complicated social and scientific
satire. Stella Gibbons' "Cold Comfort Farm" is a detailed satire on a
number of specific novels and authors of the time (such as Mary Webb)
but is mostly read as an entertaining rustic comedy mostly without
that knowledge.
answers6: um.. no. y do that?
answers7: I personally don't think so, but why don't you try?
answers8: No, the text won't make sense without realising the authors
intentions.
answers9: I think its important to have some insight into the author
if we really want to recognise his talent and beliefs i.e Kurt
Vonnegut in Slaughter-house Five............a book about the horrors
of Dresden bombing, without the knowledge that Vonnegut was present at
the bombings one could easily label the book immature and maudlin
Friday, 6 September 2019
Book report.Any tipe of book . .?
answers1: To find a book report? That's cheating. <br>
Go to the library. Read a book. And do your homework!
Go to the library. Read a book. And do your homework!
Thursday, 5 September 2019
Nintendo DS Book Games?
answers1: 100 classic books i think is the only book game for ds
answers2: spectrobes beyond the portal <br>
sonic the dark brotherhood sonic rush sonic rush 2 sonic adventure
{almost like a pirate thing i dont know the story} <br>
new super mario bros { very fun! } <br>
id ont knwo what you mean by book like games unless you mean reading
a storyline thats almost all the ds games xD
answers2: spectrobes beyond the portal <br>
sonic the dark brotherhood sonic rush sonic rush 2 sonic adventure
{almost like a pirate thing i dont know the story} <br>
new super mario bros { very fun! } <br>
id ont knwo what you mean by book like games unless you mean reading
a storyline thats almost all the ds games xD
Wednesday, 4 September 2019
PINTEREST, INC. [PINS] - THE KEY TO SUCCESS LIES IN CONCENTRATING ON THE OVERALL PICTURE.
Pinterest, Inc. [NYSE: PINS] shares fell -1.18% or -0.41 points from their previous closing price of $34.42. The stock reached $34.01 during the last trading session. Over the last 5 trading days of the week, the PINS share price rose for 2 out of 5 days, increasing by +0.59% over the last 7 days.
PINS had two major price moves with the last trading session as the price rose to a high of $34.67 and reached $33.72 at one point. The most recent high is set lower than the 52-week high of $34.67. The most recent high is the $34.67 high. The 52-week high is currently at $36.83 from the current stock price, marking a rally from the recent low of $23.05. The 52-week high is now at $36.83 from the current stock price.
Pinterest, Inc. (NYSE:PINS): Analyst Valuation and Results of Operations
Stock traders often keep abreast of what leading stock market analysts are saying about a possible stock purchase. When it comes to Pinterest, Inc. PINS], the most recent average analyst rating available, comes from the quarter ending in December. On average, stock market experts give PINS a hold rating. The share price ranged from 23.05 to 36.83. This is compared to the last closing price of $34.42.
Wall Street analysts give their ratings on a scale of 1 to 5 and the current average for Pinterest, Inc. [PINS] sits at 2:58 a.m.. This is compared to 1 month earlier when the average rating was 2.58.
For the quarter ending March 19, Pinterest, Inc. [PINS] generated revenues of $0.2 billion. That's 0.65% more than the average estimate of $0.2 billion presented by Wall Street analysts. The three above indicators suggest that the stock as a whole has a mixed mix of positive appeal and some drawbacks, making it a somewhat risky investment that also has the potential to generate a high ROI over the long term.
Keep an eye out for the next planned quarterly results that this company is expected to publish on Do 7 November (65 days).
Fundamental analysis from Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)
Let us now turn to profitability: with a current operating margin for Pinterest, Inc. PINS] was -9.88 and its gross margin was +68.04.
The return on total capital of this company is -7.70, the return on invested capital 12.60%. The return on equity is -7.04 and the return on assets is -5.23. These figures indicate that Pinterest, Inc. is poorly managing its assets and is unlikely to be able to deliver successful short-term results to its investors.
In order to investigate the capital structure of this company, Pinterest, Inc. [PINS] has generated a total debt to total equity ratio of 17.39. Similarly, the total debt to total assets ratio is 12.69.
What about the valuation? The enterprise value to EBITDA of this company is -337.97. The enterprise value to sales for this company is now 24 August.
Shifting the focus to employee efficiency, Pinterest, Inc. PINS] earns $420,663 for each employee as part of their payroll. Also of interest are the liquidity data of this listed organization: its quick ratio is 8.20 and its current ratio is 8.20. Taking these ratios into account, this company has a healthy ratio between its short-term cash and cash equivalents and its short-term liabilities, making it a less risky investment.
Pinterest, Inc. [PINS] has 548.07 million shares outstanding, representing a total market capitalization of $18.86 billion. The share price ranged from 23.05 to 36.83. At its current price, it has fallen -7.65% from its 52-week high and 47.57% from its 52-week low.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) of this stock is 55.87. This RSI value is good, indicating that this stock is neither overbought nor oversold.
Conclusion: Is Pinterest, Inc. [PINS] is a reliable buy?
Shares of Pinterest, Inc. PINS] provide investors with both positive and negative signals. Wall Street analysts have mixed valuations when it comes to the 12-month price outlook, and this company's financial figures show a combination of strengths and weaknesses. Based on the price performance, this investment is somewhat risky and at the same time has a reasonable potential for ROI.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
Is the book empire by orson scott card high school level book?
answers1: Book level = 5.7 <br>
<br>
Interest level = Upper Grades <br>
<br>
~Dr. B.~
answers2: Yeah--but far from his best. "Ender's Game" is the
beginning of one of scifi's greatest series of novels. <br>
His best stand-alone novel is "Pastwatch: The Redemption of
Christopher Columbus," which I highly recommend.
<br>
Interest level = Upper Grades <br>
<br>
~Dr. B.~
answers2: Yeah--but far from his best. "Ender's Game" is the
beginning of one of scifi's greatest series of novels. <br>
His best stand-alone novel is "Pastwatch: The Redemption of
Christopher Columbus," which I highly recommend.
Tuesday, 3 September 2019
What is book 1 of....?
answers1: Check this <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.vampirates.co.uk/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.vampirates.co.uk/</a>
answers2: The first book of the series is "Vampirates: Demons of the
Ocean" <br>
http://www.amazon.com/Vampirates-Demons-Ocean-Justin-Somper/dp/0316014443/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-8412583-2845536?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177764140&sr=1-1
<br>
<a href="http://www.vampirates.co.uk/"
rel="nofollow"class=Clr-b>http://www.vampirates.co.uk/</a>
answers2: The first book of the series is "Vampirates: Demons of the
Ocean" <br>
http://www.amazon.com/Vampirates-Demons-Ocean-Justin-Somper/dp/0316014443/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-8412583-2845536?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177764140&sr=1-1
Monday, 2 September 2019
what books are included in "the prophets"?
answers1: OK, permit's unpack this and realise its context. This is
Isaiah of Babylon (Isaiah forty-fifty three). His old prophetic
challenge used to be to steer the exiles to go back. That is, the
individuals of Judea (the subject close Jerusalem) were hauled off to
Babylon as slaves, however the coming of the Persian king Cyrus (see
Isaiah forty five) has began a brand new regime with out slavery. So,
the entire thrust of this aspect of Isaiah is to get the descendants
(the seed) of those carried into exile to head dwelling to Jerusalem.
There's one more an identical subject matter occurring: the
ingathering of the diaspora. The individuals of Judea have been
scattered in all places the arena on the time of the Babylonian
captivity, and this passage is approximately getting them again in
combination. A 3rd subject matter, which fills so much of the Hebrew
Bible's prophetic literature, is the craving for the top of tribalism
(the "international locations" are the tribes of the Levant in
Isaiah's utilization) and the collecting of all peoples earlier than
the holy One. We can see this at the recognition on "no different
Gods;" the quite a lot of tribes had their possess deities. How can
this be significant to us in these days? How are we able to
reinterpret this old fabric to exhibit us how we would are living
faithfully? Do we, like Isaiah's individuals, ought to be prodded and
begged to assert plentiful lifestyles as loose individuals? Do we
ought to be booted out of our relief zones? Well, sure. Are we caught
in tribalism and department? Do we want the prophet to remind us that
the way in which of tribalism and fake gods is not the exceptional
means? Do now we have some thing we will be able to be taught from
strangers ("their witnesses?") Well, sure. Does the international web
serve the rationale of having us out of our relief zones and our
tribalism? Does it deliver the international locations in combination?
Does it "get ready the way in which of the Lord, make directly within
the barren region a freeway for our God?" Is this digital freeway a
freeway to deliver us in combination? I suppose so. But it is viable
to magnify this. Radio and tv are as a rule the identical deal. It
turns out to me that God continues throwing us approaches of bringing
the international locations in combination, and we in most cases
misuse them. Grace and peace to you.
answers2: There was 4 major prophets.Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel <br>
12 minor prophets. <br>
Hosea, joel, amos obadiah jonah micah, nahum habakkuk zephaniah haggai
zechariah malachi.
answers3: Book of Isaiah <br>
<br>
Book of Jeremiah <br>
<br>
Book of Lamentations <br>
<br>
Book of Ezekiel <br>
<br>
Book of Daniel <br>
<br>
Book of Hosea <br>
<br>
Book of Joel <br>
<br>
Book of Amos <br>
<br>
Book of Obadiah <br>
<br>
Book of Jonah <br>
<br>
Book of Micah <br>
<br>
Book of Nahum <br>
<br>
Book of Habakkuk <br>
<br>
Book of Zephaniah <br>
<br>
Book of Haggai <br>
<br>
Book of Zechariah <br>
<br>
Book of Malachi
answers4: All the books in the Old Testament from Isaiah on. Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel are called the Major Prophets and the
rest are known as the minor Prophets. Lamentations just kind of hangs
on to Jeremiah (Same writer). Doesn't matter which version you use
they are all the same.
answers5: Isaiah through Malachi
Isaiah of Babylon (Isaiah forty-fifty three). His old prophetic
challenge used to be to steer the exiles to go back. That is, the
individuals of Judea (the subject close Jerusalem) were hauled off to
Babylon as slaves, however the coming of the Persian king Cyrus (see
Isaiah forty five) has began a brand new regime with out slavery. So,
the entire thrust of this aspect of Isaiah is to get the descendants
(the seed) of those carried into exile to head dwelling to Jerusalem.
There's one more an identical subject matter occurring: the
ingathering of the diaspora. The individuals of Judea have been
scattered in all places the arena on the time of the Babylonian
captivity, and this passage is approximately getting them again in
combination. A 3rd subject matter, which fills so much of the Hebrew
Bible's prophetic literature, is the craving for the top of tribalism
(the "international locations" are the tribes of the Levant in
Isaiah's utilization) and the collecting of all peoples earlier than
the holy One. We can see this at the recognition on "no different
Gods;" the quite a lot of tribes had their possess deities. How can
this be significant to us in these days? How are we able to
reinterpret this old fabric to exhibit us how we would are living
faithfully? Do we, like Isaiah's individuals, ought to be prodded and
begged to assert plentiful lifestyles as loose individuals? Do we
ought to be booted out of our relief zones? Well, sure. Are we caught
in tribalism and department? Do we want the prophet to remind us that
the way in which of tribalism and fake gods is not the exceptional
means? Do now we have some thing we will be able to be taught from
strangers ("their witnesses?") Well, sure. Does the international web
serve the rationale of having us out of our relief zones and our
tribalism? Does it deliver the international locations in combination?
Does it "get ready the way in which of the Lord, make directly within
the barren region a freeway for our God?" Is this digital freeway a
freeway to deliver us in combination? I suppose so. But it is viable
to magnify this. Radio and tv are as a rule the identical deal. It
turns out to me that God continues throwing us approaches of bringing
the international locations in combination, and we in most cases
misuse them. Grace and peace to you.
answers2: There was 4 major prophets.Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel <br>
12 minor prophets. <br>
Hosea, joel, amos obadiah jonah micah, nahum habakkuk zephaniah haggai
zechariah malachi.
answers3: Book of Isaiah <br>
<br>
Book of Jeremiah <br>
<br>
Book of Lamentations <br>
<br>
Book of Ezekiel <br>
<br>
Book of Daniel <br>
<br>
Book of Hosea <br>
<br>
Book of Joel <br>
<br>
Book of Amos <br>
<br>
Book of Obadiah <br>
<br>
Book of Jonah <br>
<br>
Book of Micah <br>
<br>
Book of Nahum <br>
<br>
Book of Habakkuk <br>
<br>
Book of Zephaniah <br>
<br>
Book of Haggai <br>
<br>
Book of Zechariah <br>
<br>
Book of Malachi
answers4: All the books in the Old Testament from Isaiah on. Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel are called the Major Prophets and the
rest are known as the minor Prophets. Lamentations just kind of hangs
on to Jeremiah (Same writer). Doesn't matter which version you use
they are all the same.
answers5: Isaiah through Malachi
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)